|
September 6, 2007
Dear Virginia, there's no Google Sandbox!
Why should you care about Search Engine Optimization? Because organic traffic from search engines is free. Organic traffic refers to traffic that results from real searches on a search engine as opposed to pay per click ads or other paid placement on that search engine's pages. Getting your site is in the top results for a popular search term can send loads of free traffic to your web site, that's why you should care.
How hard is it to get top placement for a particular set of keywords or phrase? The more competitive the search term, the harder it is to get top placement. By competitive, I mean more sites are trying to rank well for that search term. For example if you have 500 sites that are trying to rank well for a phrase, it's not all that difficult to get your site on the first page of results from a search, however, if you have 1.5 billion web sites competing, it's a different story!
Who do you trust for advice? Now that's the $100,000 question! There are so many people claiming to know the secret to getting your site on the first page of results, most of these people have no clue that what they're selling, teaching, or preaching is wrong. Ok, some DO know their advice is wrong and they simply don't care, they only want your money. For most people, it's a trail and error process to find advice that works. That's the path I took. I bought products and courses, and read blog after blog after blog. I tried this and I tried that. I believed people who said only trust someone who can show proof. But their advice was wrong too. You can spend ludicrous amounts of money to find out that what you've purchased sounds great, and the research looks impressive, but when you put it into practice your search engine placement get worse, not better. Everyone is screaming "Buy My Product", Buy My Product", "I'm the only one telling you the truth". So why should you believe ME? Because, I've been where you are, and, I'm going to tell you what I've learned that works and I'm going to tell you for free.
Why would I tell you this for free? Won't I ruin my own placement by doing this? No, because most people will not take action on it. In fact, most people won't take action on advice they pay for or courses they purchase. It's just human nature. People want to improve, but rarely follow-through with the actual steps required.
Some popular myths.
Myth #1: You need to submit your site to all the search engines and do so on a regular basis. There are even sites that you can subscribe to (yes, I mean pay them a monthly amount of money) that will do this for you. It's completely useless, a complete waste of money. Why? Search engines spend a great deal of money, time, and effort finding and analyzing every web site that they can. They want their results to be better than their competitors. All you have to do when you have a new web site is get its URL linked on a page that is already indexed by the search engines, and the search engines will find you. You can do this with forums, blogs, other sites you own, etc. Once a search has your site in its database, it's there. It'll keep checking your site. You don't have to resubmit it over and over (don't get this confused with blog updates and pinging, that's something different). You may ask, what about the No-Follow Tag? Well, because search engines want to find every site that they possibly can, if a link contains the no-follow tag, it does not mean the search engine's spider will not add the linked site to it's list of sites to crawl, all it means is that the search engine will not count a link with a no-follow tag as a link with regard to ranking placement of the linked site.
Myth #2: One other thing you hear about is the "Google Sandbox". This theory states that a new site will not rank well for competitive search terms for six months to a year after launch, that Google quarantines new sites for that period of time before including them in their search results. I've had new sites start getting search engine traffic almost overnight. There is no sandbox. Why would a search engine want to suppress returning a valid result for a search? It just makes no sense. The likely source to this theory comes from that fact that the more competitive your targeted search term or keywords, the more inbound links you'll require to rank well. Building those links takes time, sometimes months. In a very competitive situation, until you get a similar number of inbound links as the sites you're competing with, you'll never place well in the search engine rankings.
Myth #3: The third myth I'll cover is that you need a particular keyword density, or, number of keywords on your page, header, or other various parts of the page. If you put a lot of occurrences of your keyword(s) on a page it's called "stuffing". Stuffing is bad on web pages; it's good with turkey, but bad for SEO! It's easier to get higher placement in Yahoo or MSN by putting a higher number of keywords on your pages, but Google will not like it. Most people want to rank well with Google and will take anything they get from Yahoo or MSN as extra gravy. You don't need to count your search phrase keywords, just use natural sounding language. In fact, for Google, you want to make sure you don't use the phrase too much on a page. I actually think keyword counting and keyword density worked in the past, but because of abuse, the search engines look at other factors now. Google will definitely penalize you if you even remotely appear to stuff your keyword(s).
So, what does work? What are the facts?
One thing to understand is that what you do to get good ranking in Google is not the same as for Yahoo or MSN. Some pages will rank well across all three, but it requires a huge number of inbound links and quality content.
Quality matters. Search engines are generally smart enough to detect pages that you've copied or loaded with crappy content. They're not always correct; after all it's not a human reading the page, but rather a computer scanning the text of a page. This works in both directions too, sometimes a relevant, well written original page will not rank as high as it probably should, but most of the time, the crappy pages get detected as being crappy and the good pages are recognized as being good. So spend you energy and time building something worthwhile vs. trying to beat the system: it'll pay off in the long run.
Keyword usage: For Google: Use your keyword phrases sparingly: a few times in the header area, in the title, and Meta tags, and a few times in the text on the page. Build tons of inbound links with the keyword(s) in the link text or title tags. For Yahoo or MSN: put more keywords on the page and again, build those inbound links. I don't think the exact number matters, it's easy to see what happens when you go from around 8 to something like 25 occurrences. Note that it can take a few weeks for Google to update it's rankings for each change. I've done this as an experiment several times. What happens when you go from 8 to 20 or so occurrences is your ranking will go way down. For example, if you were showing up on the 3rd page of results you may now be on the 8th or 9th page of results, or even worse. Remove all those stuffed keywords and you'll return, after a week or so, to roughly where you were. Don't take this to mean that 8, as I used in this example, or any other number, is the "magic" number of keywords to have on a page, it's more complex than that. For Google, I've found pages that rank in the first page of results for keywords that do not even appear on the page! How is this possible? Because the keyword appears in the text for inbound links to that page. Google puts a lot of weight, or value, on the number of inbound links and the text associated with those links.
Outbound and Inbound Links. We know that Google likes sites with lots of inbound links, or links pointing to your site from other sites. So how about outbound links on your site that point outbound to other sites? Do they hurt you? The simple answer is No. I've read articles that say outbound links hurt your rankings, but the authors are wrong. Unless your site is in the following list of categories, you don't want to have links pointing to these kinds of sites: spam sites, hate sites, sites that feature or promote illegal activities, pornography, etc. Having outbound links to these types of sites will hurt your ranking placement and in some cases get you removed (de-listed) from the search engine results. You don't want the reverse either; you don't want lots of those kind of sites pointing to you. However, that's not completely in your control (like the links on your own site are) so it's not going to hurt you if one or two decide to link to you for whatever reason. So, as long as your outbound links don't point to these types of sites, they won't hurt you. After all, that's how the Internet works, one site linking to another.
One Way, Two Way, and Three Way Linking. I agree with those that say the best kind of link to get is a one way link to your site from another site. This means that they've linked to you, but you've not linked to them. These types of links occur naturally as you add more and more content to your site. But, in most cases, they take a great deal of time to accumulate in any significant numbers. You can exchange links with other sites, this is called two way links. In this case, you have a link to them and they have a link to you. This is not weighted as strongly by the search engines as a one way links is, but still, it's a link, it still counts. You can also do something call 3-way linking where your site (site A) links to site B, which links to Site C, which links back to your site (site A). This appears to the search engines to create inbound, one way links. There are services and products that help you setup and create link exchanges on your site, such as www.3WayLinks.Net. Some people argue that two way and three way linking are violations of the search engines terms of service, or what's called "Black Hat" methods. My opinion is that it's OK and that link exchanges (two or three way) are not Black Hat.
Summary:
SEO is both science and art. If it was all science, a person could create a program to analyze a page and determine how it will rank. Some have come close to doing this, but most programs that claim to do this aren't even close. Why, because it involves factors outside of what's on the page. It's a competition between your page and thousand, even millions, of other web pages. There are things that work and things that don't, and lots of people willing to take your money and run. You can spend thousands of dollars a month for their "secret" knowledge that will only make your sites rankings drop and your pockets empty. Don't let that happen to you.
Watch this blog for more info. In fact, signup using the subscription form below. I will have future posts that talk about the products I use that work and what I do that works. In addition, I will expand this post into a training product, complete with a piece of software that I've been writing to help track my SEO progress.
Until Next Time,
Fred
About the Author
Fred Black is an experienced programmer, web site developer, online business operator, systems integrator, father, husband, musician, and songwriter. Visit his Internet Business Blog at: http://www.pqInternet.com.
|
Posted by Fred on September 6, 2007 | Printer-Friendly
TrackBack: http://www.pqInternet.com/Blog/mt-tb.cgi/82
Assigned Categories:
Search Engines: SEO
Related Entries:
|
You may reprint or distribute this article as long as you leave the content and the About the Author resource box at the end intact. |
|
Comments:
-
Great point, the main reason for all the myth is that it creates some healthy income for some folks.
As advocate for better usability I proclaim that you should start out with quality information for HUMANS. In fact, that helps your ranking, too. I sometimes refer to SEO as 'usability engineering for the spiders'. Adios. -- John W.
-
I have a love/hate relationship with SEO. I've seen too many techies screw a good article into the ground in order to maximize hits. That's why I appreciate the reminder: QUALITY COUNTS!
There is no substitute for good content. If you attract the world to your site, and it looks like amateur day at the pre-school, you're worse off than if nobody knows you exist. -- JRIngrisano
-
Great article!
I have clients who want me to write webcopy for them with keywords every 10 to 12 words - instead of arguing with them, I'm just going to send them to read this now! I have always written for humans and it work wth Google.
I'm glad to say I had enever heard fot eh Google sandbox - I just figured it could take a while to earn a page rank for a new site.
|
|
Post A Comment
|
|
Enter your name and e-mail to receive a short notice each time I make a new post.
NOTE: You will receive a confirmation email. You must click the link in the email to subscribe. Please check your spam folder(s) if you don't receive the email.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
